You're new to the business. You want to find work, but instead you're finding — to your intense frustration — that, as hungry as Bay Area employers are for experienced technical communicators (especially C++ and Java-literate software technical writers), they're even more impatient with candidates who aren't what they're looking for.
Well, Synergistech can help, but not in the way you may be hoping. I probably can't get you work unless you already have the kind of technical experience and 'demonstrated aptitude' that my clients pay me to help them find. But I can put over a decade's industry experience to work for you — for free — to make some suggestions about how to get yourself out of the Catch-22 of "No experience? Sorry, no job." (And after you've gotten that first job and held it for 18 months or so, I'm sure to be able to work with you to our mutual advantage.)
Understanding the hiring manager's perspective
Before we explore what to do to make you marketable, let's first look at things from the hiring manager's perspective.
Today's technical publications hiring manager is not in an enviable situation. More than likely, he or she is what's come to be called a "working manager," meaning that they don't just supervise people and attend meetings — they write, edit, and produce pages (a lot of them) just like their writers.
Most Silicon Valley technical publications managers started out as staff technical writers or editors in the same department that they now manage. They are often expected to continue to carry their full writing workload after they've been 'promoted,' and must learn how to manage 'on the job' because most local employers don't train new managers (or offer much support if things go wrong). Is it any wonder that few do it well?
Among the privileges of management is expanded responsibility. In practice, this means that it's the manager's fault if someone on their (more than likely overworked) team misses a milestone, goes over budget, or fails to document that nifty feature the developers added the day before the deadline. Their own management is always pressuring them to improve productivity and reduce costs, and their staff gets increasingly frustrated, resentful, and tired. It takes a rare manager to survive (much less resist) these pressures; we know more than a few who have ulcers.
If you're still unsympathetic, consider that the Bay Area's love affair with all things technical threatens publications managers' future just as much as it makes your life as a job seeker tougher. Engineering-centric Bay Area companies — the majority of them, in other words — seem only interested in hiring those candidates (including pubs managers) who are the technical peers of their product development counterparts. They won't hire 'mere' people-managers (smart adults who value individuality and understand the importance of cooperation and compromise) if they can instead hire a techie they can trust (someone with a CS degree who will defend the engineers' right to do things their own way and who'll just make sure the writers are "ready to ship when we are").
Okay, you say, but at least managers already have a job. True, but perhaps not for very long. To compound their problems, most can't return to the ranks of 'regular writers' because their skills are out of date — their tools knowledge is too weak, their product understanding too light — and their salary requirements are out of line, to say nothing of their motives being forever suspect in the eyes of their would-be future peers.
In case you're curious how they resolve this dilemma, many managers choose to leave their employers and try contracting, but others (often those with dependents) hang on and do their best to hire (or retain) the people who'll make them look good — frequently those they would have passed over a few years back for being "overqualified." They're scared, and with good reason.
So why precisely should I care about a pubs manager's problems?
Because it's your job to solve them. Not by providing managers with a new career path (!), but by making it possible for them to meet their current responsibilities without having a heart attack. To most managers, the gurney is not the reward they had in mind. In fact, most managers really do want to meet (and even beat) their own management's expectations.
What's my real job? Your job is to give the hiring manager convincing evidence of your ability to do the job, and specifically to demonstrate your ability — not just your willingness — to:
Why 'Give me a Chance; I'll prove myself' seldom works
To see why this attitude seldom works in anyone's favor, let's reverse the roles for a moment. You're sitting behind the hiring manager's desk with orders from above to, say, bring someone aboard at $25/hr to produce a quickie web page for an important project. You're sifting through a dozen resumes from your favorite headhunters, knowing that at least ten of the candidates are more expensive than you can afford. You know you don't have the power to pay more (many managers don't), so you turn to the remaining two resumes.
Both candidates are junior writers with no commercial publications experience. One went to an Ivy League school and boasts a good GPA and a cell phone number, the other went to Podunk U. and majored in Art History. But the latter has a URL on her resume, and no typos either. You're intrigued. You fire up your web browser and look at her work. Humble, but clean. What's this, though? She's listed some references, people she says taught her HTML. She's also, you notice, volunteering as a copyeditor on her STC chapter's newsletter. So who ya gonna call, the one with the rich daddy or the woman with initiative and a demonstrated interest in doing what you need? And whose job is it to lose?
Does it make sense now that, unless you show some initiative to learn the kinds of skills hiring managers need, you don't have the right to complain that they won't take a chance on you. Put another way, if you've got the phrase book and the time to study, and you're not even trying to speak their language, is it any wonder that the natives are reluctant to learn yours? In the current context, can you understand how such an attitude can appear arrogant to someone who needs your services but fears being exploited?
From the hiring manager's point of view, technical communications in the Bay Area is much more technology-centric than it is communications-centric. Many managers assume, albeit often wrongly, that everyone can write. The reason they can justify to their management that you're worth more than, say, a computer-illiterate journalist is that they value your technical know-how and industry experience.
What do I really have to know?
Certainly the alphabet soup in many of Synergistech's job descriptions can be overwhelming. Just know that we are often asked to find some pretty rare specimens (who may not even exist at all), and that the budget for the teams to which these technical communicators will be contributing frequently extends into the seven-figure range. If you were in their shoes, could you afford not to try to hire the best and the most technical?
However, as a newcomer to the business, all you need do is take note of which skills reappear in the majority of our listings, and make it your business to learn as many of them as you can, preferably before you apply for a job. Refer to our tech writers' resources page for some suggestions on how and where you might do this.
When we're asked which technical skills can ensure a technical communicator's marketability with our clients, we often cite the following (in descending order of importance):
Also, and very importantly, be aware of your "crossover skills" — those skills you already have that are relevant to technical commnications. You must be able to sell a hiring manager on the relevance of your prior work experience. Although not a substitute for knowledge of the audience (eg, developers) and/or subject matter (eg, computer software), technical communicators require significant non-technical skills such as the proven ability to:
For example, you could discuss:
Practical suggestions for getting experience
The rest of this page contains some practical suggestions for getting experience and creating a portfolio when you've never worked in the business.
If you find an employer willing to train and pay you (typically $10-15/hr) for up to 30 hours/week (more than that and the employer is required by California law to provide benefits, which gets pricey), doing anything related to technical communication, grab on tight with both hands. Of course, you don't want to be exploited; be sure that you'll be able to take a copy of a real documentation product (to which you contributed, of course) with you when you leave, and that you'll have at least one warm body (preferably with an impressive title) to use as a reference. In exchange for that, however, you'd best do whatever it takes (within reason). Why? Because over 90 percent of all internships turn into offers of staff employment.
A variation on the formal internship arrangement that may prove equally valuable to its participants is for an aspiring tech writer to subcontract from a busy contractor. STC members who show up at meetings looking bleary-eyed and/or haggard are often putting in insane hours because their employer or client demands it, and they're very easily talked into giving up some of their workload to an eager (and presumably cheap and reliable) helper. In exchange for a little informal training and perhaps the use of their computer while they're sleeping off an all-nighter, many contractors with impossible deadlines can profit handsomely by offloading the more repetitive or boring of their responsibilities to someone else. In this way, aspiring technical writers get to contribute their existing skills quickly on a commercial project and get a reference out of the bargain as well. Pay rates range from zero to a modest lump sum for completing the work to the primary contractor's satisfaction within the deadline.
You should also understand that Synergistech advises contractors not to expose themselves to too much risk, financially or otherwise, when dealing with subcontractors. It's impossible to anticipate the nature and number of potential complications, and the goal of the exercise is primarily to assist you. Don't get too optimistic that "anyone can do it," and do ask for clarification from the contractor whenever you're unclear on the next step. Even if you're getting paid a lump sum, so your mistakes don't add to the contractor's cost to engage you, the time wasted doing something that has to be redone can mean missing a deadline or damaging a reputation.
You'll now have before-and-after samples for the three most common kinds of writing done in the Silicon Valley. In producing them, you'll have demonstrated:
So there you have it, my (highly opinionated) take on the market for entry-level writers.
Thanks for your interest in working with Synergistech, and for telling others in your situation about this page's suggestions. I look forward to working with you when you are ready to get in touch.